Affichage des articles dont le libellé est صحة. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est صحة. Afficher tous les articles

mercredi 7 décembre 2011

Graham: God can comfort our hearts after the death of a loved one


Dear Rev. Graham: A friend of mine lost her husband to cancer about two years ago. They were a devout couple and she has no doubt that he's in heaven now. But she prays to him every day, asking him to be with her and watch over her, and things like that. Should she be doing this? -- Mrs. M.B.
Rev. Graham: No doubt she feels the loss of her husband very much, and I suspect she's still grieving over his death. Although her hope is misplaced, this may be the only way she thinks she can keep his memory alive.
If her husband somehow could return and spend even just one minute with her, I have no doubt that he would urge her to put her faith and hope in Christ alone. Her husband is now safely in heaven, and some day they will be together again.
But in the meantime, only Christ can save us, and he alone is the one to whom we should look for the help we need.
The Bible says, "For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" (1 Timothy 2:5). Don't let anyone take Christ's rightful place in your life!
Pray for your friend, and urge her to turn to Jesus Christ for the peace and comfort she seeks. Few things in life are harder to bear than the death of a loved one -- but God knows what we're going through and can comfort our hearts by his Spirit. Jesus' promise is for her, and for all who are hurting: "Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you.... Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid" (John 14:27).
Send your queries to "My Answer," c/o Billy Graham, Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, 1 Billy Graham Parkway, Charlotte, N.C., 28201; call 1-(877) 2-GRAHAM, or visit the Web site for the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association: www.billygraham.org.

1 in 100 Teens Involved in Sexting


Although teen sexting is a subject of controversy, new research suggests concern about the practice may be overblown.
New studies from the University of New Hampshire Crimes against Children Research Center have found that the number of youth who send nude pictures of themselves that would qualify as child pornography is very low.
Moreover, researchers discovered that when teen sexting images do come to police attention, few youth are being arrested or treated like sex offenders.
The research is presented in the studies “Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study” and “How Often Are Teens Arrested for Sexting? Data From a National Sample of Police Cases,” published online by the journal Pediatrics.
In the first study, researchers surveyed 1,560 Internet users ages 10 through 17 about their experiences with sexting — appearing in, creating, or receiving sexual images or videos via cell phone or the Internet.
Investigators determined that 2.5 percent of youth surveyed have participated in sexting in the past year, but only 1 percent involved images that potentially violate child pornography laws — images that showed “naked breasts, genitals or bottoms.”
“Lots of people may be hearing about these cases discovered by schools and parents because they create a furor, but it still involves a very small minority of youth,” said lead author Dr. Kimberly Mitchell, research assistant professor of psychology at the UNH Crimes against Children Research Center.
In a second study, researchers discovered that in most sexting cases investigated by the police, no juvenile arrest occurred. Arrests did occur in 36 percent of the cases where there were aggravating activities by youth, such as using the images to blackmail or harass other youth. In cases without aggravating elements, the arrest rate was 18 percent.
The second study was based on a national sample of 675 sexting cases collected from a systematic survey of law enforcement agencies. Researchers discovered the very few teens who were subjected to sex offender registration had generally committed other serious offenses such as sexual assault.
“Most law enforcement officials are handling these sexting cases in a thoughtful way and not treating teens like sex offenders and child pornographers,” said lead author Janis Wolak, J.D.
In both studies, researchers found that sexual images of youth rarely were widely distributed online as many parents, youth, and law enforcement fear. In the teen survey, 90 percent of the youth said the images they created did not go beyond the intended recipient.
Even in the cases where the images came to the attention of the police, two-thirds of the images stayed on cell phones and never circulated online.

Gene test could spare women from unnecessary radiation


A new gene test may spare thousands of women with a common type of breast tumor from unnecessary radiation, according to a study released today at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium .
  • This genomic test could be a good way for women to determine if they are really at risk.
    This genomic test could be a good way for women to determine if they are really at risk.
This genomic test could be a good way for women to determine if they are really at risk.
The test, which analyzes 12 genes from a woman's tumor, helps predict which cases are most likely to be aggressive — requiring both surgery and radiation — and which are likely to be slow-growing, requiring surgery alone, says lead researcher Lawrence Solin, chairman of radiation oncology at Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia.
"This is a perfect example of how understanding the human genome can be translated into real life, to help real women," Solin says. "This is a very exciting advance."
The test, from Genomic Health, aims to help the more than 45,000 American women a year diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS. While some doctors consider the tumors to be very early breast cancers, other experts regard them as precancers. Although these tumors are confined to the milk ducts, they have the potential to invade the rest of the breast.
Until now, however, doctors haven't had a good way to tell which cases of DCIS are the most likely to spread, Solin says. Women with the condition often are treated as if they have a more advanced cancer, with lumpectomy and radiation, and sometimes years of hormonal therapies. In the case of DCIS, radiation reduces the risk of developing another tumor in the same breast, but doesn't improve survival, says Steve Shak, Genomic Health's chief medical officer.
And while radiation is generally safe, it can burn the skin and damage the underlying heart and lung tissue, Shak says. Going to radiation treatments also is time-consuming, requiring daily visits for five to seven weeks, Solin says.
The study shows that about 75% of women fall into the "low-risk" category, according to their gene profiles. After 10 years, only 5% of these women developed an invasive cancer — a more serious type that had advanced beyond the milk ducts — in the same breast.
Yet 11% of women fell into the "high-risk" group. About 19% of these women developed an invasive breast cancer within 10 years.
Women and their doctors may want to use this information to guide their treatment, Shak says. A similar test for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer has been available since 2004. That test, Oncotype DX, helps predict which patients may be able to skip chemotherapy, contributing to a 20% drop in chemo use, Shak says. Genomic Health plans to make the DCIS test available by the end of the year. Although the gene test isn't cheap — its current cost is $4,175 — it could still save money, he says. Radiation therapy can cost more than $21,000.
"For women who really don't want radiation therapy or a mastectomy, this might well be a way to determine whether they 'should take the risk,' " says surgeon Susan Love, president of the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation. "It is the first step to being able to figure out which DCIS is important and which is not."
Some cancer specialists aren't ready to change their practice, however. Eric Winer of Boston's Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, who wasn't involved in the new study, says he'd like to see additional studies before using the test to advise patients.
"It makes everyone more comfortable to sit with the data for a little while to understand it, rather than rush out and start using it," Winer says. "People will need to think it through."
Jackie Fox, who was diagnosed with DCIS three years ago, says she welcomes tests that can help women make difficult decisions. Fox, 55, of Omaha, initially hoped to have a lumpectomy and radiation. After the smaller surgeries were unable to completely remove her cancer, however, she agreed to a mastectomy. "It just seemed so drastic to me, for something that I was told was not life-threatening," Fox says. "If we could reach the point where women didn't have to wonder anymore, where they didn't have to second-guess, that would be wonderful."